Over 58373

Climate Politics

Obama Blames Global Warming For ISIS & Boko Haram -

Arguing with climate change skeptics -

TAGS: climate change deniers pigeon
Rating: 3.96/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Pikeman - November 4, 2015, 10:10 am
What are you going to believe computer models that have failed to predict reality or or your own senses.
fauxnews - February 7, 2015, 5:05 pm
You know....you're a real pain in the a**. :)
Curlyrocks - February 6, 2015, 8:15 pm
The sun in their diagram is in fact much smaller than the sun in reality, and appears to be giving off much less solar radiation than it actually does.

Bill Nye the Socialist Clown -

Warmist Insanity: Climate Change Is Causing Child Marriage -

Global Warming Is A Hoax -

Got 99 problems -

1100 BC -

Consensus, Models & Predictions vs. REALITY -

TAGS: global warming myth hoax climate change scam green energy farce consensus models predictions reality ipcc al gore greenies alarmists warmists
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 4, 2015, 12:39 pm
Here's a possible explaination, http://www.cato.org/blog/you-ought-have-look-climate-sensitivity-environmental-worries-are-trending-downward

Eco-Pope Francis -

Idiot In Chief Obama -

AL GORE- CLIMATE CHANGE - If it weren't for Al Gore, I would not have known that climate changes!

climate change -

Man-made global warming fraud -

Liberal Science Deniers -

CLIMATE ALARMIST HYPOCRITES - 140 private jets, 1,200 limos and 40K tons of CO2. In one week these clowns will create a carbon footprint equal to the annual footprint of 30 small countries.

FINALLY DONE WITH THAT ASTRONAUT STUFF - Now we can get on with Obama's new priorities of Muslim Outreach and Climate Alarmism. Isn't that inspiring?

Climate Change = Agenda 21 & Globalization -

Scientific Consensus on Global Warming??? -

TAGS: global warming consensus climate change hoax scam farce michael crichton junk science green religion alarmists warmists greenies al gore ipcc agenda21
Rating: 4.69/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

calron - April 25, 2015, 9:29 pm
I've seen worse, Ala 62039. Being fired for pointing out AGW junk science.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 6:19 pm
You're wrong again, "activist" scientists, not scientists. Activist scientists have been caught drawing conclusions before doing the research, its not that hard to follow along.
calron - April 25, 2015, 5:00 pm
What's really bad is that natural variability could be used to support AGW, but some shout denier whenever you bring it up as a cause for warming.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 4:48 pm
As long as it annoys Rebecca, it is worth it to me. X-D It's the only thing keeping me going, mate. :-) F*ck carrots and gum.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:48 pm
Like when Rush Limbaugh lied this week about the Duke study. The authors of that study actually came out against him because the political media does this all of the time. That is scientists up in arm over being exploited in a non-debate
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:46 pm
By now, it's common sense knowledge in the world of academia that climatology firmly supports the theory of MMCC. The scientific community is not at odds over this. It's the public that is on the fence. Talking about it too much distracts from the issue
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:43 pm
Don't really care about any of that. If or when the media is wrong about MMCC, doesn't change the fact that the science community is firmly behind MMCC in both consensus and findings.
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:39 pm
Roughly 1.59% of the abstracts reach the conclusion that he says the majority agrees with. That's not in the ballpark. If he chose a different standard to measure the consensus, he could have got the 97.1%.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:33 pm
the scientists will just get each other's back like some country club. That's absurd. That's not what peer review means. On this issue, there has been enough fact checking that this bias would've been revealed by the present.
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:31 pm
It would appear Faux is talking about peer-reviewed journals about climate change, not the consensus. Roughly speaking, virtually all of them ARE behind the MMCC theory. OTC's problem is he thinks peer review is biased because
rebeccaolsen - April 25, 2015, 2:27 pm
Cook is guilty of being sloppy, not being debunked. Roughly speaking, he was in the ball park. Again you are splitting hairs hun. Peer review has caught it. It's just not a big enough issue to matter. Climatology isn't up in arms over this for good reason
calron - April 25, 2015, 2:24 pm
I've red a few and this is not necessary true. Take Cook's census for example. It reaches a conclusion that is debunked by Cook's own numbers rather than reaching the conclusion supported by the numbers. Peer review should catch it, but it still happens.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:34 pm
Like the past 2 years of unusual cool climate is suddenly "just weather". Anyways, have a good weekend and break that cig habit, you're more amusing nicotine free :-)
OTC - April 25, 2015, 12:31 pm
*Sigh* Perhaps you missed my posts stating that I don't deny human impact (contributing), I'm fully aware of MMCO2 but I do deny it's the sole driver of current trends in CC. And I notice anything to the contrary of MMCC is not welcomed
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:23 am
Alrighty then. Off to start my weekend. A night of me designated driving for my friends while others get drunk :-/ WEEEEE! Anyhow, fun jousting with you mate. Let's do it again next week if the spirit moves us, OTC. Cheers. :-) Fox is off the air.
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:20 am
P.S. Don't think I didn't notice you abandoning your cosmic ray Henrik denier theory. ;-) Is science like a crap shoot for you? One of these days do you just hope to roll the dice 'just right' and find a random link that will finally pay off? X-D
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
The only Quote from that article that matters - "It does not, the authors emphasize, change the evidence of human impact on global climate beginning in the 20th century." #PWNEDYOURSELF
fauxnews - April 25, 2015, 1:16 am
Even you admit, in your game of pigeon chess, that they are not removing the human element. You're grasping for straws - everything else you said is irrelevant in light of that concession.
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:10 am
OTC - April 25, 2015, 1:08 am
Well even this states it doesn't. remove the human equation, but the climate models didn't predict a cooling and that has them confused, which is funny because not everything was used in the models because scientists didn't think it was significant
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:20 pm
...the peer rev.studies themselves are pretty dry and free of politics.They make for boring reads,like plumbing manuals.They are not to be confused with the lib media that reports and distorts them.Hope this helps to FINALLY clear that up. Cheers mate :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:15 pm
...I think, sometimes, you are confusing the political conclusions drawn by the liberal crowd which I agree are conflated.However,the peer-reviewed journals simply say:MMCC is unequivocal.They do not endorse the dire predictions of Al Gore or the libs...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:13 pm
...in that sense, we've always been in agreement. The libs, as badly as the GOPers, have dragged the science dialogue into the political gutter. And the libs have their own denier issue to deal with -- the anti-vaccination movement...
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:08 pm
...The scientists are just reporting their findings. How long and how bad MMCC will affect the planet is up for conjecture.All they can claim is it's happening and a serious issue.It's not meant to be a crystal ball about next years temps or Superbowl win
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 9:06 pm
P.S. Before you go down another rabbit hole, I can save you the trouble: all the consensus says about MMCC is that it is unequivocal.It doesnt claim to predict everything. It doesnt claim it will be the end of the world.The lib politicians are doing that
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 8:56 pm
Source? I think I'm sure about what you are speaking about. But with you, I can never be sure. ;-) Provide a citation, please. And yes, the MMCC debate ended more or less many years ago. It's not confusing for the scientists, just the quacks.
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:51 pm
If the debate on MMCC is over, then why is there a global temperature conundrum that scientists plan to address this fall? I thought it was settled.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:20 pm
...except Scientology. You can judge Scientology. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:19 pm
Scientology was created in the 20th century by a science fiction author. An awful science fiction author. Religion of any kind holds us back. But none of us has the right to judge the other - Be you Xtian, Jew, Muslim, Agnostic Atheist...etc
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:15 pm
I actually respect religion even if I don't believe in God. I just don't respect fundamentalism. If you want to pick on a religion of liberal geeks, pick on Scientology. It has "science" in the title, at least. It is a liberal tard fest. X-D
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:13 pm
The science on MMCC is simply a report on the findings. Whatever problem you have with the politics of it comes with your own philosophical problem with how science works, which a**umes a theocratic pov as the inverse since you are making this about faith
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 1:09 pm
And by "theocratic", what I mean by that is - again, it's revealed when you overplayed your hand with your philosophical problem with science: Science doesn't pretend to be infallible. That is what religion is for. Science isn't a religion for geeks.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:53 pm
No, becca. Coffee. Lots and lots of coffee :-/ They have Taco Bell Mountain Dew Baja Blast in the can now for a limited time! :-D Now I dont have to sneak my McDonald's cup into there and steal it. X-D I can get my caffeine fix from the convenience store.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:51 pm
You have such unreasonable distrust toward science,wildly a**uming political bias everywhere you can.Yet you haven't a skeptical bone in your body over secular Christian ideology,which is rife with politics? You have a theocratic agenda on MMCC, mate(2/2)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 12:41 pm
It proves you are more than a simple contrarian. It proves you are delusional, mate. :-/ Your problem isn't with MMCC. Your problem is with science, and how it works. And your issue with it is a purely philosophical one.(1/2)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:29 pm
You're actually on top of things for a change.Not that obliterating OTC's argument is rocket science.Regular science would do - something he doesnt comprehend.But a coherent argument from you,Faux? You must've remembered your nicotine gum this morning :)
rebeccaolsen - April 24, 2015, 12:21 pm
"when the facts show it is wrong following a proper scientific inquiry,which already demonstrated human-induced CC was unequivocal." Finishing that sentence for you,denier :) Know you wanted to imply politics or bias was behind the rejection.Not today hun
OTC - April 24, 2015, 11:37 am
I didn't state that he disproved MMCC. But this does prove that research that finds reasons for CC other than humans is rejected.
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:23 am
And how does your idiotic anecdotal observations about weather counter my thorough refutation of Henrik? The man YOU CITED as DISPROVING MMCC?? Oh yeah,it doesn't because you can't - hence this LAME red-herring, Im sorry, I meant 'attempt at sarcasm.' :-)
fauxnews - April 24, 2015, 10:14 am
lol...You can't be serious, mate...lolololol...Yeah, the scientist's evidence vs. your own two eyes. Well...I went to China last year and didn't fall off the Earth. Guess those flat Earthers were right! X-D Hmmmm?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:10 am
Let me guess, a tornado? GW! a hurricane? GW! a blizzard? GW! so this cooler than usual weather must be GW, right? isn't that what the consensus is?
OTC - April 24, 2015, 8:07 am
We're told 2014 was the h**test year on record, yet when I'm usually experiencing several days in the 100s, we had 1, maybe 2 days in '14. & for the 2nd yr in a row its almost May but instead of the normal 90s we are barely hitting the 80 degree mark
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 10:01 pm
So please, mate, call me a "denier." In fact, I will be disappointed in you if you don't. Yes, I'm the biggest JUNK SCIENCE DENIER around. ;-) If in your game of pigeon chess that represents Check mate, then it's a game I'm PROUD to lose. #WINNINGBYLOSING
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:57 pm
But basically you say any interpretation of science you present is BEING DENIED if we disagree with it. Fair enough. I'm a JUNK SCIENCE DENIER. I see your junk science and raise you 10000+ peer reviewed studies and the 97-99% consensus that backs it.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:56 pm
It's point (B) you are refuting. Now with your debunked cosmic ray nonsense. The effectiveness of GCRs in cloud formation has been shown to be dubious. GCRs exert a very tiny influence over low-level cloud cover, not enough to account for sh*t.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:53 pm
But the reason WE KNOW man-made CO2 is causing GW now is because (A) CO2 in theory CAN cause CC (a point you've conceded) and (B) thousands of investigations by reputable scientists and have found the correlation in a myriad of ways that is unequivocal.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:52 pm
Just because man-made CO2 or cosmic rays COULD cause climate change, doesn't mean all climate change is caused by CO2 and cosmic rays. See what I did there? I included CO2 as well.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:50 pm
Sure...if all this happened, it could cause global warming. But there is ZERO evidence that any of this happened. And by pushing it, you are engaging in a causal fallacy. ie.Just because Socrates is a man, doesn't mean all men are Socrates.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:49 pm
In order for GCRs to successfully seed clouds, they must induce aerosol formation which THEN must grow sufficiently through the condensation of gas in our atmosphere to form cloud-condensation nuclei. Then his must lead to increased cloud formation.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:47 pm
FACT- Cosmic ray flux on Earth has been monitored since the 1950s, and has shown ZERO-ZILCH-NADA significant trends over that period. FACT - our global solar magnetic field also has NOT changed appreciably over the past thirty years.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:45 pm
However, it turns out that none of these hypotheticals that Henrik proposed are occurring in reality. For instance, a nuclear winter COULD create global cooling. But that doesn't mean nukes caused the ice age.lol.. What matters is the PRESENT causes NOW
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:39 pm
Hypothetically, an increasing solar magnetic field COULD deflect cosmic rays, which hypothetically seeds low-level clouds, thus decreasing the Earth's reflectivity and causing GW.That's his hypothesis.But is that ACTUALLY happening? Is it the reality now?
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:36 pm
In fact, it's funny, but you are pretty much just copying and pasting what Henrik is saying. I know. I checked. Again, here is the refutation mate--->
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:34 pm
You're simply posting something without demonstrating comprehension of the concepts involved.I gave you the methodology to verify your claims.You ignored it and simply repeated an empirically disproven concept.In other words,you're talking out of your a$s
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:31 pm
Mother nature is not denying the science. You are, denier. There are 4 requirements that must be true for his theory to be valid. They failed to produce results when tested repeatedly against empirical variables. And you are not replying to that.
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 9:28 pm
And that didn't reply at all to the evidence I cited. Just more pigeon chess from you. Yes, you are good at the copy and paste function, mate. Now apply that same vigor to actually learning the science you deny. :-) You might learn something
OTC - April 23, 2015, 9:02 pm
You understand his findinds that when the sun is active, as it has been, it shields us from cosmic rays reducing cloud cover which heats up the planet. with the sun becoming less active, more cosmic rays will produce more clouds
OTC - April 23, 2015, 8:55 pm
The sun is going into a grand minimum, temperatures have flatten recently and scientists are suggesting a cooling period. There's too much invested in the MMGW hype to accept a Global Cooling. Everyone can deny that science, but Mother Nature won't
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:21 pm
It turns out that none of these Hen'schypotheticals are occurring in reality, and if cosmic rays were able to influence global temperatures, they would be having a cooling effect. This IS why he is ignored and why you don't know **** about MMCC.Cheers :-)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:18 pm
In summary,studies have shown that GCRs exert a minor influence over low-level cloud cover,solar magnetic field has not increased in recent decades,nor has GCR flux on Earth decreased.In fact,if GCRs did have a significant impact,cooling wouldve occurred
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:16 pm
3)Cosmic rays must successfully seed low-level clouds.4)Low-level cloud cover must have a long-term negative trend. Fortunately climatology had empirical variables against which they tested these requirements. Study after indie study debunked Hen's theory
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:12 pm
In order for this theory to be plausible, all four of the following requirements must be true.1)Solar magnetic field must have a long-term positive trend.2)Galactic cosmic ray flux on Earth must have a long-term negative trend
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:09 pm
, the Sun can turn the temperature up and down. ... As the Sun’s magnetism doubled in strength during the 20th century, this natural mechanism may be responsible for a large part of global warming seen then." End quack quote. (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:07 pm
Henrik Svensmark says -- It's cosmic rays! The quack says, "When the Sun is active, its magnetic field is better at shielding us against the cosmic rays coming from outer space, before they reach our planet. By regulating the Earth’s cloud cover,(1/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:05 pm
who also say radiation is proof of Jesus's resurrection because they claim it explains away the carbon dating which shows the Shroud of Turin to have originated a few hundred years ago, not 2000 yrs ago. Junk science is real neat, huh? (2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 6:01 pm
He IS ignored because he was proven wrong. PERIOD. He blames everything and I mean EVERYTHING on cosmic rays, including evolution. Congrats! You know how to use Google, mate. ;-) While you at it there you'll find these Russian "scientists" too (1/2)
OTC - April 23, 2015, 5:09 pm
Like Henrik Svensmark who gets ignored because his research didn't coincide with the consensus
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:20 pm
Even so, Michael Crichton's opinion on this means about as much to the CC debate as Steven Spielberg's opinion. ie.Not very much. A poster like this plainly proves the deniers are simply trolling science. It is proof of nothing. 1 Lion
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:18 pm
We are discussing 10000+ studies, reproducible results, in what is called PEER-REVIEW. The consensus vernacular is plainly the "CC for Dummies" explanation for that.It is not meant as a substitute for hard science, which already exists for MMCC(2/2)
fauxnews - April 23, 2015, 4:14 pm
Michael Crichton, who is the author of this quote, never did a study on climate change. Nor was he a climatologist. The part you missed, though, was where he says: "what is relevant is reproducible results." Every major CC study has been reproduced(1/2)

Bloviating Windbag -

CO2 rising while temperatures flatten -

TAGS: climate change is natural
Rating: 4.42/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - April 18, 2015, 5:16 pm
Must be talking about the Westboro Baptists
fauxnews - April 18, 2015, 3:41 pm
PWNed lol
DebtToAmerica - April 18, 2015, 3:35 pm
"claims god is unknowable. claims to know god hates liberals."
fauxnews - April 17, 2015, 5:22 pm
TITLE TRANSLATION(in OTC speak):"Atmospheric science and climatology is a complex CONCEPT I don't fully understand. But somehow I fully understand that a man is responsible for his changing contradictory stances even if I don't think it applies to me."X-D

It's a cycle stupid -

TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - February 4, 2015, 5:28 pm
you're the one believing what cranky said i believe about CO2. I've made posters contradicting that
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:51 pm
proper syntax*RIDING-THE-FENCE
fauxnews - February 3, 2015, 6:50 pm
False information?how about NO information.When you actually provide something tangible,I'll let ya know.In the meanwhile,you're content trying to pass off'riding-the-fence'as a actual argument so that way no one can question you.How childish can you get?
OTC - February 2, 2015, 6:04 pm
So you admit you weren't paying attention and that your rhetoric has faux believing false information
crankyhead - February 1, 2015, 2:10 pm
OK then OTC, now's your chance to explain yourself. Provide the 'true info', or whatever you want to call it.
OTC - February 1, 2015, 7:53 am
Faux, you're believing what cranky said I believe, not what I believe. You see how easy it is to believe false info?
fauxnews - February 1, 2015, 2:44 am
lol...So, OTC, you are saying that natural CO2 is different than man-made CO2? OTC...let me introduce you to my good friend, the 'periodic table.' ROFLCOPTER
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
…been able to get him to explain why.
crankyhead - January 31, 2015, 3:29 pm
Moreover, OTC doesn't even deny CO2's involvement as one of the main causes of climate change. What he does deny, however, is that the CO2 the is produced by industry (coal, fossil fuels, etc…) is the same stuff produced by nature. And I've never...
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:54 pm
Zeit, stop confusing facts with opinions
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:53 pm
Sure faux, I've even been to (according to Al Sharpton) Iowa Canada
OTC - January 28, 2015, 8:51 pm
Well, since you're gonna answer for Zeit I tell you you're both wrong, I don't deny climate change
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 3:13 pm
Now that's a good boy.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 2:12 pm
Why would I insult Canada? It's a beautiful country
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:41 pm
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:40 pm
So now comes "clown" and "skippy" and the other nervous tics when you get a little unraveled..lol..You're falling apart at the seams, man! Get a grip. P.S. You forgot to insult Canada X-D
fauxnews - January 28, 2015, 1:35 pm
Uh, climatology. duh..lol..And the 97% of climatologists/scientists that disagree with you.Plus, now, apparently, all the Republicans in the Senate who've said, and I quote, global warming is NOT "a hoax." Is that"specific"enough for ya?If so,ACES! X-D
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:09 pm
Your sentence sounds like you're talking about the science of carbon taxation
OTC - January 28, 2015, 1:04 pm
Deny what science? be specific
Zeitguy - January 28, 2015, 11:55 am
Debating the issue of carbon taxation is one thing, but to deny the science is quite another.
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:49 am
Great, another clown who thinks he knows me. news flash skippy, if a republican had made it and if republicans were pushing tax and control because if man-made global warming the poster would have 'republicans'
OTC - January 28, 2015, 9:45 am
So tell, what is it I'm denying?
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:25 am
he doesnt believe in scientists, he thinks they're just liberals wearing labcoats. and that dog that barks all night? its a liberal too. and the terrorists? they're definetly liberals. and that obama guy is the biggest liberal of them all!
DebtToAmerica - January 28, 2015, 12:21 am
you'd be cupping the balls and s******ing the bull**** if it was a republican who had made "an inconvinient truth". and i think its hilarious.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 9:23 pm
Scientific community? I didn't know Al Gore and Sheldon Whitehouse were scientists
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:45 pm
OTC, really? Liberals? Come on man. Stop with the blind labeling to establish your own shortsighted validation. In this case call them the scientific community and yourself the faith driven denier. It's OK, the first step is the hardest.
OTC - January 27, 2015, 2:05 pm
The aim of liberals is to attack when always questioned
Bandit5906 - January 27, 2015, 12:26 pm
The aim of science is to always question!
Zeitguy - January 27, 2015, 7:49 am
Change "liberals" to scientists and stop confusing weather with climate.

GLOBAL WARMING PROTESTERS - What? The Earth's been cooling for 10 years? And there's a blizzard out there? And the Climate Change scientists have been cooking the books? We're still marching! I already got the permits!

Global Warming Denial -

TAGS: climate change denial snow man
Rating: 3.22/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

Zeitguy - July 19, 2014, 6:27 pm
That's a little bit funny.

You can have your own set of opinions... -

How Republicans View Scientific Consensus -

TAGS: climate change denier darth vader
Rating: 2.45/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

calron - April 5, 2015, 3:03 am
Which part the Star Wars reference, the original sin reference and other religious references, or that he is attacking people on MMGW beliefs?
RonaldReagan - April 5, 2015, 2:59 am
Don't get it
freasy - March 10, 2015, 1:01 pm
I am against the Patriot Act, and many other things the government does.
DebtToAmerica - March 10, 2015, 12:59 am
what do they have to gain by tricking people into thinking that MMCC is real? if government intervention is their goal, why arent you campaigning against the patriot act and other anti-terror laws that violate the constitution?
OTC - March 9, 2015, 12:33 am
Yes, climate change is. real. It's man-made climate change that's a hoax

Loony Liberals -

NASA – CO2 is a Global Coolant -

Obama pushes climate change hoax agenda -

TAGS: climate change is normal
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by OTC

OTC - July 7, 2013, 6:01 pm
Comments like- " I know for a fact though, than human beings are pumping trillions of tonnes of the stuff into the atmosphere annually by burning fossil fuels." Comment #54878
OTC - July 7, 2013, 5:49 pm
The conclusion can be made by your comments as to what you believe
StoneTools - July 7, 2013, 3:09 pm
Please explain how CO2 was the cause of global cooling in the seventies and global warming in the 2000s
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:02 pm
...Please explain to us how it's possible that naturally occuring CO2 can warm up the atmosphere, but man made CO2 doesn't? Please explain to us how you keep these two obviously conflicting thoughts in your head at the same time, and believe both.
crankyhead - July 7, 2013, 12:00 pm
How is it that OTC continues to pretend to tell me what I believe, instead of taking the time to try and understand what I believe? I NEVER said that the production of CO2 was the exclusive domain of man. You dimwit. What I said, OTC, was this...
JGalt - July 6, 2013, 12:00 am
in increasing CO2 from a measly 280 ppm to 400 ppm???? WTF Logic Fail. Arguments and fancy discussions about about the greenhouse effect are not going to overcome physical chemistry and thermal conductivity experiments....of a gas at 400 ppm vs 80% N2
JGalt - July 5, 2013, 11:52 pm
In the 70's CO2 rose and the scientists were worried about global cooling and the next ice age. If the thermal conductivity of Nitrogen is nearly twice that of C02, how do liberals justify that the 80% of Nitrogen atmosphere is overcome by global warming
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
For something we have no control over
OTC - July 4, 2013, 6:47 pm
How is it liberals think CO2 only comes from man and only CO2 is causing global warming? Solar activity has nothing at all to with it, nature it self has nothing to do with it, only man. Idiots, global warming is nothing more than a means to tax people
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:19 pm
...begin to even pretend to yourself, that billions of tonnes of man made CO2 being pumped into the atmosphere isn't toying with that cycle? Honestly, please explain to me, how it is you can believe two opposite things at the same time.
crankyhead - July 4, 2013, 3:17 pm
You too OTC. Thanks for telling me what I believe. You guys must be debate team champs or something. Let me ask you something OTC, if you're willing to concede that CO2 levels in the atmosphere are part of the 'warming/cooling' cycle, how can you...
OTC - July 3, 2013, 5:07 pm
One more time, I don't disagree the earth goes through cycles of heating and cooling, I do disagree that man is the cause of the current warming and since that is what you believe, I have to disagree with you.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:32 pm
..levels were much higher than they are now.The sun's output and the Earth's position correlate to temp changes better than any CO2 graph does.Temps trend up AND down with the same CO2 levels.If Gore was right, that wouldn't be true.
KaBoom - July 1, 2013, 7:28 pm
CO2 does have a greenhouse effect and all things being equal will increase temps.However, the temp is NOT completely dependent and there is no such thing as a "runaway greenhouse effect." There have been numerous ice ages that have happened AFTER CO2..
crankyhead - July 1, 2013, 1:58 pm
Good of you to not disagree with me, OTC. I must be finally getting through to you.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:54 pm
crankyhead - May 3, 2013, 5:47 pm, #54770 Increased levels of CO2, is what I said, OTC. You can agree or refute, I'll wait.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 8:43 pm
"who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up"- cranky. Comment #54770
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:15 pm
That's called cognitive dissonance folks. It's a hallmark of right wing ideology.
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:14 pm
Let's see... who was it that I was talking to, who admitted that a rise in CO2 caused the earth to warm up enough to end an ice age, but somehow wants to not believe that a rise in CO2 is warming up the planet?
crankyhead - June 29, 2013, 4:12 pm
CO2 is, in fact, a greenhouse gas, you idiot.
OTC - June 29, 2013, 1:52 pm
ST, according to that article, it seems liberals think the news media are scientists. 'A rise in CO2 while temperatures are in a lull' , lets see, who was it that argued with me that a rise in CO2 is causing the rise in temperatures?
StoneTools - June 28, 2013, 3:04 pm
OTC - June 28, 2013, 1:57 pm
If we observe it is raining, should we sound the alarm for global flooding?
OTC - June 27, 2013, 12:16 pm
Renza, before stating your opinion, did you research that to see if the opinion was derived from research or did you merely state your opinion without any research?
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 8:54 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and using bogus results from "research" to "prove" your results.
Renza - June 27, 2013, 8:14 am
There's also a difference between stating an opinion and doing research on the topic before stating an opinion.
StoneTools - June 27, 2013, 1:11 am
There's also a difference between saying "there's a tornado coming" and saying "Man caused that tornado to exist"
terroraustralis - June 27, 2013, 12:36 am
they arent predicting climate change, they're observing it. theres a big difference between saying theres a tornado coming, and saying "hey, look over there! a tornado!"

AL GORE - Somehow, he managed to succeed in making conservative Republicans care about science to a certain......degree.

It's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change ... -


Climate Crusader DiCaprio -

BIGFOOT? - No, its just hypocrite Al Gore's carbon footprint, on his way to the church of global warming.

Climate Change Is The Global Crisis Key To Unlock The New World Order -

TAGS: climate change global crisis key unlock the new world order gordon brown quote global warming hoax greenies warmists alarmists hysterians eco fascism socialism nwo ipcc
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

freasy - May 5, 2015, 12:39 pm
Bottom line, the data was fudged. Lies Lies and d***ed lies.

Yoda Wisdom -

scientists agree -

Patterns -


Sea of Plastic -

Winter storm in the spring -

"Children won't know Snow" -

The New Al Gore -

Looks like the earth has been cooling -

Obviously -

TAGS: global warming failed so liberals changed the name to climate change
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by OTC

crankyhead - November 20, 2013, 2:37 pm
I guess the trailer park doesn't teach you about fluctuations on linear graphs?
OTC - November 20, 2013, 11:51 am
I guess liberal schools don't teach about 'averages'?
crankyhead - November 20, 2013, 3:56 am
Obviously, the squiggly black line shouldn't be squiggly at all, if indded there is a 17 year pause. It should be flat. Obviously.
StoneTools - November 20, 2013, 1:04 am
but, but, but cranky says you aren't reading the data correctly.

CLIMATE CHANGE - There will winners and losers.

Climategate 2 (the truthining) -

TAGS: climate gate 2 the thruthining
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Curlyrocks

Curlyrocks - February 14, 2014, 12:28 pm
I have no doubt this will result in 10 years of new taxes to claw back all the $ spent on BS.


The Climate Crusader -

Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Al Gore -

STOP GLOBAL WARMING - Live like Al Gore!

Climate Change Garbage -

TAGS: warming algore climate change
Rating: 4.67/5

More politifakes by PeteofSanJose

PeteofSanJose - January 30, 2014, 1:34 am
I remember in grade school being told that at one time North America, it was covered by glacier ice. THEN we had global warming and the ice retreated. It formed the Grand Canyon. It's called a natural cycle. Happened before and will again
PeteofSanJose - January 30, 2014, 1:32 am
Thats funny right there, I dont care who you are!!!
OTC - January 29, 2014, 6:03 pm
Martians ignored the 'Martian-Made' Global Warming climate scientists...
Curlyrocks - January 29, 2014, 1:47 pm
Oh yeah all planets climates are changing all the time. There may have been a layer of ice or frost at one point but like dry ice on earth it would instantly evaporate when warmed and be carried by the winds to re-solidify at the coldest part, the poles.
PeteofSanJose - January 29, 2014, 12:16 pm
the report I listened to was about the ROVER discovering water from eons ago. Scientist did not say what "type" of water or how long ago, just that it was there. And now it is not. so the conclusion was, global change of some sort at some time.
Curlyrocks - January 29, 2014, 9:47 am
I don't think there ever was liquid water on Mars. The atmosphere on Mars is too thin to support liquid water, becasue Mars only has 1/3 earths gravity. Unless Mars used to be bigger and support a thicker atmosphere liquid water only exists under ground.

Double Barrel Hypocrisy -

Stupidity -

TAGS: gore climate stupidity
Rating: 4.64/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Cyberhagen - October 11, 2014, 1:21 pm
I'm not in the habit of defending this moron, but here, it's really just a case of semantics. The silk is passing through the udders like he said, just not all by itself. You could take it either way.
terroraustralis - October 5, 2014, 7:14 pm
gore is wrong on this one, the milk of the goats contains spider silk protein, which must be seperated from the milk before it can be spun into fibers for things like bulletproof vests

Climate Crusader -


Climate Change March -

Greenpeace Hypocrisy -

'Extinct' Snail Killed by 'Climate Change' Crawls Back from the Dead -

TAGS: more climate change bunk
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 1:29 am
you're technically correct, but the "more GW BS" part implies that you think this snail's continued existence is proof that global warming doesnt exist.
terroraustralis - September 15, 2014, 1:28 am
"villifying science" yes you are. and i find it hilarious that you, of all people are trying to insult someone by saying they lack the capacity to understand something... its the best example of "pot calling the kettle black" that i've ever seen.
EmmaRoydes - September 14, 2014, 2:46 am
bwahahahahaha, vilifying science. Talk about not understanding stuff. There's a huge difference between poopooing climate change and poopooing science. Not that you would have the capacity to understand that.
terroraustralis - September 13, 2014, 1:55 pm
i guess they realised there is no point talking to a brick wall, so they chose to abort.
terroraustralis - September 13, 2014, 7:55 am
only because you and your ***khead mates are using it to distract people from stuff that actually matters, like the soon-to-be operation desert storm 3, and the ukranian civil war, and obama's latest lies... you and fox are obama-lovers in disguise.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 13, 2014, 2:58 am
aye, you forgot to add to that "and ONE American fanboy":"TA" showed us the thread whereby YOU were kissing HIS rear about "nuclear power." As if you really gave a crap. You were hoping to befriend him into joining your troll campaign. Worked out well,aye
CthulthuDownUnder - September 13, 2014, 2:52 am
truthfully, we heard the word "ward", it is a great word and slip of the tongue. trying to figure out which one they have you locked up in. according to you, the one for "trolls?" aye
EmmaRoydes - September 13, 2014, 12:27 am
by the way, I'm referring to TA and his two aussie fanboys (one of them just trolls the forum)
EmmaRoydes - September 13, 2014, 12:25 am
EmmaRoydes - September 13, 2014, 12:25 am
trolls may not be the right ward, maybe fanboys would be better. Nah, fanboy trolls pretty much describes them.
EmmaRoydes - September 13, 2014, 12:20 am
How do you make a self-professed scientist cry? Make a poster arguing against global warming. It elicits immediate attacks by TA and his trumpeting band of trolls. It's pretty hilarious how serious they take this crap.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 12, 2014, 7:53 pm

Emma hasn't been "bothering" me. Please don't make statements like that unless you know what you're talking about. You guys really need to relax.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 7:04 pm
"yeah, i wasnt kissing your a**, i was insulting your intelligence!". you do realise you could have just said "its called civility, just because you arent being an a**hole to someone doesnt mean you're kissing their a**".
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:51 pm
"HAHA, THE OTHER SIDE IS PISSED OFF AND THEY THINK THAT WE'RE A PACK OF IDIOTS!". nice victory condition you got there, but next time you should try to avoid admitting that you're trolling. people tend to get banned for that kind of thing.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:46 pm
to clarify, we arent angry because you're a conservative, we're angry because you're VILLIFYING OUR CHOSEN CAREERS, and you REFUSE to understand the concept that NOT EVERYONE WHO DISAGREES WITH YOU IS A LEFTIST.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:44 pm
1) nobody here is "left wing". i'm a libertarian and Cthuludownunder is a conservative. 2) you and your "buddies" are villifying science, THAT is what this whole thing is about. you're ATTACKING MY PROFESSION. Cthulu and i have EVERY RIGHT to be pissed.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:37 pm
strange... you speak of my "panties all wadded up or tears streaming down my face", and yet YOU'RE the one who's been bothering Moo? had you considered that he might have better things to do than fight your battles for you?
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:33 pm
at first i thought the same, but then i realised his tone was far too apologetic and submissive, and he ended his post with a promise to make better posters. to me it screamed "i'm a good boy mister moderator! i swear!"
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:27 pm
i WOULD go back to "intelligent" postings as you call them, but YOU NEVER LISTENED TO THEM. i speak moron to you because its the only language you understand.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:25 pm
you have no idea how hilarious it is seeing someone who claims to be a woman, using such mysogynistic terms to attack me. "put on your big girl panties", how ladylike.
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:23 pm
because when you're trying to explain something simple to someone with a single-digit IQ, repetition is the only method that works. i commend you for actually recognising that i'm just repeating myself, it shows that you're starting to listen!
terroraustralis - September 12, 2014, 6:21 pm
funny, because you still take the time to read it.
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 2:28 pm
Congratulations, Emma! Seems CnthulthuDownUnder is bound and determined to go above and beyond to prove the point of this poster with three paragraphs worth of "I can't prove my point! WAAA!" HA! HA! Let's see how far he plans to carry his conniption
EmmaRoydes - September 12, 2014, 10:22 am
That was precisely what the intent was mooo. There was just too many other angry TA posts that I didn't feel like addressing that one.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 8:07 am
no rational person would read this article and make the claims this poster did.you also confuse anti-science hatemongering with conservatism. Aye,the REAL question that needs to be asked of you is this:why do far-righties hate the truth and facts so much?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 7:59 am
what's TRULY hilarious is watching you, a RINO, use the same tactics as liberals (lies, emotion, distortion) to win at all costs. Conservatives who support science + don't believe in god = lefties according to you. Nice logic you got going there RINO.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 7:56 am
aye,the poster says it but the article it is based on does not. terroraustralis,moo and I are conservative. this isn't about snails. Also,for lack of a better way to express this,what are YOU having a CONNIPTION fit? Clearly the poster is lying propaganda
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 7:47 am
epic success? a poster deliberately taking an article out of context to mislead the reader(a tactic you accuse the left of)? everyone's a leftie who disagrees w/u?Are you two having a contest of who can utter the dumbest comment? Smart move there. You win
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 4:18 am
The only thing this poster says is that a snail, thought to be wiped out by climate change, is actually alive. The fact you left-wing lunatics are having a conniption fit over the fact that this snail is alive is hilarious. Why do you lefties hate snails?
foxrecon19d - September 12, 2014, 2:27 am
This poster tried to prove that despite all the anti-conservative hatemongering and blustering of the left-wing, they still cannot prove anything except they hate conservatives. And from the responses this poster got from the left, it was an epic success
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 12:14 am
So having made rational points refuting this poster I dont expect YOU to be an ADULT and respond with mature rational points of your own. Instead,I fully expect u to be yourself and prove OUR POINT ABOUT YOU with whatever nonsense comes out of your mouth
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 12:07 am
In other words: this disingenious poster, and presumably anyone who pushes it, intentionally ignores what was ACTUALLY said and constructs a strawman in order to PROVE its case. But i doubt you're ADULT enough to respond with ADULT refutation of your own
CthulthuDownUnder - September 12, 2014, 12:03 am
Now did you blindly post this article WITHOUT actually reading it? That is dishonest in its own right. Or did you intentionally post it knowing it was bunk; especially laughable in light of you using it to show that "climate change" is bunk. Who is bunk?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 11, 2014, 11:59 pm
3) Finally, the article you disingenuously cited also states: This may be one of the few cases of extinction that ... may plausibly result from the direct impacts of climate on survival.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 11, 2014, 11:58 pm
2) That same paper you disingenuously cited also notes that no specimens had been found despite extensive searches (i.e. it wasn't a case of "we can't see them, they must be dead") and that, therefore that snail may be considered extinct.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 11, 2014, 11:57 pm
1) The snail wasn't declared extinct due to "climate change" (in the sense of GW). The paper you disingenuously cited quite clearly states that the "extinction" was due to "regional changes in rainfall pattern." (Which was directly measured).
CthulthuDownUnder - September 11, 2014, 11:56 pm
i wonder if the appeal of Politifake for some is that they see this as a place where you can make crud up and try to pass it off as real. Then you open your mouth and confirm my suspicions.You want ADULT debate?Here is what is wrong with your propaganda:
CthulthuDownUnder - September 11, 2014, 11:53 pm
Aye, quitting smoking is one of the hardest inner demons I ever struggled with. I feel your pain. hang in there. that is what your friends are for. sorry to hear of your struggles. you have my empathy. take it easy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 11, 2014, 11:23 pm

Ahh....Sorry guys, I have a few things going on right now and i'm trying to quit smoking. I'm just not in the mood, but I shouldn't be taking it out on you. My bad.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 11, 2014, 10:46 pm

You're making a**umptions TA....Just like Emma is with this poster. You guys take this **** WAY too seriously. I don't want PMs from either of you about this.....I have actual problems to deal with.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 11, 2014, 10:38 pm

I didn't see it as "kissing my arse" at all....In fact, I thought he might be trying to throw The data collected by my own countrymen in my face.
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 9:53 pm
You might find that people are more receptive to intelligent postings rather than the 3rd grade attack postings that you and your 3 buddies are lamely attempting. But, having said that, at least your buddies are humorous with their childish trolling
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 9:49 pm
Panties, and post something that refutes my postings, or at leave your angry outbursts at the door and engage in adult discussion?
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 9:48 pm
Did anyone ever tell you that you are a one trick pony? You post the same crybaby craps over and over, never anything new, never anything that refutes what obviously makes you get angry and cry. Why don't you just wipe the tears off, put on your big girl
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 9:41 pm
Other than a picture of your panties all wadded up or tears streaming down your face, you haven't said anything worth even reading
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:48 pm
or obama's blatant gun-grab in the wake of the sandy hook shooting? or obama's fast and furious program? or the IRS scandal? or obama's broken promises about getting rid of the patriot act? or obama's unwavering support of the unconstitutional NSA spying?
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:33 pm
funny you should say that, i see alot of anti-climate change posters, and not a single pro-climate change poster... perhaps someone is trying to distract people from the fact its obama's fault ISIS now controls half of iraq and syria?
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:23 pm
whether it is hurricanes, a cold winter, or snails, one FACT is certain in this world: you are scientifically illiterate and don't understand the first thing about the scientific process. if you actually HAD a scientific degree, you WOULD understand this
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
and you TRULY think no one with integrity notices by now that you are piloted by a rageful agenda and are too irrational, dishonest and emotionally unstable to take any of this seriously? that what MAKES YOU a troll, that you are laughably unaware of this
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
seriously, do you REALLY think trying to be manipulative by kissing arse about Canada AND stirring the pot with unnecessary, insecure comments about whether people are deleting make-believe posters is HELPING your credibility in YOUR war against science?
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
are you able to do that: argue BASED UPON THE MERITS? rather than change the subject so you can attempt to manipulate the conversation? of course NOT. You thought the snail poster was PROOF against global warming. don't lie about it now
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:21 pm
the only thing MORE pathetic is you admitting that you spy on the approval queue to see what posters are being made so you can troll better. i don't think anyone here deleted posters on it JUST FOR YOUR SAKE. you're making things up now. ALSO PATHETIC.
terroraustralis - September 11, 2014, 5:21 pm
Yeah right, like kissing Moo's arse by dropping the name of a CANADIAN scientific article is proof against climate change. PATHETIC. Your snail poster is a FAILURE based upon the merits; like your manipulative BROWN NOSING of others calling you out on it
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 8:35 am
You were absolutely right, but I noticed all the posters that were made about conservatives hating science were deleted from the approval queue last night. Was it a change of heart?
foxrecon19d - September 11, 2014, 4:54 am
In fact, I'll bet money that some leftist propagandist who cannot defend the failed policies of Barack Obama is now going to create more tired posters screaming about how conservatives hate science or some other bull**** like that. Watch and learn...
foxrecon19d - September 11, 2014, 4:53 am
Truth be told, climate change is a subject that has been hijacked by leftist propagandists to say, "HEY! Look over there!" They have nothing to stand on and cannot defend their ignorant leftist propaganda.
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 12:02 am
destroy, I'll start making more posters highlighting the follies of climate alarmism. I'm not a graphic artist, so it will take me some time to get them right.
EmmaRoydes - September 11, 2014, 12:00 am
But, just to add to this poster, mooooo, did you happen to read the November 25, 2013 Canadian weekly magazine Macleans cover story? Adds more fuel to the climate alarmist fire. But, since you rightly insist that a single event does not an alarmist theory
EmmaRoydes - September 10, 2014, 11:36 pm
I never said it resolves any debate. I can't help what you read into a poster.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 10, 2014, 9:34 pm

One study got one thing wrong!?!.....that clearly ends the whole debate. Call the press conference right now, people need to hear about this. This is dumber than the hurricane debate.
Bandit5906 - September 10, 2014, 8:13 pm
Well said, ER! 5L
EmmaRoydes - September 10, 2014, 6:17 pm
Oops, that should be mollusk! Sorry about that.

SUSTAINABILITY, LEADING BY EXAMPLE - Ignored by the mainstream media, Al Gore's new $9 million dollar digs in Montecito, California. Way to go Earth Boy!

Climate Change Alarmist Data Manipulation -

DEFEATING CLIMATE CHANGE COMMERCIAL - Your campaign's over before it started, Newt!

Climate Change in the Distant Past -

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 3.86/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 9:11 am
on real scientists, who are really above all of the nonsense that is going on, yet get questioned on their conclusions.
EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 9:09 am
If you are interested in why there are so many science skeptics nowadays, check out retractionwatch.com. You will see why modern science is shooting itself in the foot. It's really unfortunate that science is now receiving such a black eye and the effect
EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 8:40 am
The point is that modern science is doing too much trusting and not enough verifying.
EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 8:38 am
research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties.
EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 8:38 am
It probably should be in another thread, but Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 'landmark' studies in cancer research. In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on
EmmaRoydes - July 24, 2014, 8:23 am
You too. You can start by explaining how someone who doesn't buy the manmade global warming thing is somehow of the "creationist mindset"
Zeitguy - July 24, 2014, 3:50 am
Zeitguy - July 23, 2014, 11:52 pm
Keep up the good work.
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 10:08 pm
But because science has been wrong before, doesn't mean that it's wrong every time or that I'm an idiot as you are implying because I'm skeptical.
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 10:05 pm
I can list a number of times that science has been wrong (phlogiston and b'utter have already been brought up -- are you saying those things didn't happen?
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 10:04 pm
I do, however, think you have some real issues with understanding that not everyone thinks the way you do and that doesn't necessarily make them wrong.
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 10:00 pm
Where in the hell are you getting this "creationist mindset" and "you know more than the scientific community" crap from?
Zeitguy - July 23, 2014, 9:07 pm
The fact that scientific methodology works this way is what it gives it value. The fact that it works this way also seems to give those with an agenda a false angle of attack.
Zeitguy - July 23, 2014, 9:03 pm
Science is based on constant refining of theory based on evidence. It, unlike your creationist mindset, does not yield to preconceived ideology. Apparently you think you know more than the scientific community.
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 8:50 pm
This might be more to your liking: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/what-thawed-the-last-ice-age/
EmmaRoydes - July 23, 2014, 8:46 pm
"cloaked in the shortcomings of scientific theory" -- OK, so I've been saying all along that science is not infallible and you finally come around to that realization. Congratulations.
Zeitguy - July 23, 2014, 4:56 pm
The first step in having discussions concerning public policy is accepting the scientific evidence. Myopic , denial cloaked in the shortcomings of scientific theory stalls that process.
Curlyrocks - July 23, 2014, 1:30 am
fukushima leak. You know that horrible apocalyptic catastrophe that happened when we came up with a brilliant plan to solve global warming, I guess crustaceans disintegrating and fish bleeding out their eyes is better than a 2 degree temperature increase.
Curlyrocks - July 23, 2014, 1:27 am
about what (or in the case of GW alarmists Who) caused a minute difference in temperature why not focus on cleaning up some of the actual messes we know for a fact we caused and are in our face like the pacific garbage patch, or actually stopping the
Curlyrocks - July 23, 2014, 1:25 am
I can't argue the temperature of the earth because it is warming. What I can argue is that the earth has undergone much more drastic changes before the industrial revolution and every one needs to calm down and then change their pants. Instead of worrying
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:47 pm
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:47 pm
the CO2 in the atmosphere, you would remove about 15-20% of the total greenhouse gases.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:45 pm
Yes, CO2 traps heat. But water vapor, also a greenhouse gas, is about ten times more powerful than CO2, and water vapor is considered THE most important greenhouse gas. There are others that are more powerful than CO2 (e.g. methane) If you removed 100% of
sportacus - July 22, 2014, 11:42 pm
The earth is coming out of an ice age. that explains any alleged warming. The world is now going through a cooling cycle. This winter wouldnt have been possible if the world is in such bad shape. this winter will be followed by many more like them
sportacus - July 22, 2014, 11:40 pm
Al Gore and his wife, longtime married couple, are separating. Tipper Gore. And they may get a divorce. Apparently what happened, they experienced global cooling.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:36 pm
Scientists think that the climate on Venus used to be similar to Earth. Venus is around 460 degrees Centigrade today with massive amounts of CO2. Man never existed on Venus, so it occurred naturally. So, what's your point?
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:26 pm
Apparently not since scientists are still trying to determine why past temperature increases predate the increase in CO2.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 11:24 pm
Seriously? Creationist debate tactics? Did you really mean to say tha?
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 9:27 pm
Our sister planet, Venus, is a great example of the effect of Greenhouse gases.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 9:25 pm
Scientists are in complete agreement that greenhouse gases trap heat and increase temperature. Volcanic ash tends to reflect solar energy and cool the planet.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 8:53 pm
Your creationist debate tactics display your lack consideration for anything that upsets your fragile equilibrium.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 9:20 am
*200 to 1400 years*
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 9:20 am
If you look at the ice core samples, as an example. The temperature rises 200 to 1400 before the CO2 increases. (according to Scientific American)
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 9:14 am
Scientists are still trying to answer the question of does a rise in temperature cause more CO2 to be released or does a rise in CO2 cause temperatures to rise.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:31 am
Now, instead of offering conclusions, please show me your scientific facts.
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:31 am
3. What proof do you have that there is manmade CO2 in any significant amount in the atmosphere? 4. How does the solar/volcanic activity compare to that of 100,000 years ago? (what's your source and who observed it?)
EmmaRoydes - July 22, 2014, 8:27 am
1. What was the average global temperature 100,000 years ago? (what's your source and how did they measure it?) 2. What were the CO2 levels 100,000 years ago? (what's your source and how did they measure it?)
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 2:12 am
Now instead of denial of these findings please show me your scientific findings to the contrary.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 2:07 am
1. The is earth warming 1.3 degrees in the last century. 2. C02 levels are the highest in 100 thousand years. 3. The additional C02 radioisotope in the atmosphere is from the combustion of fossil fuels. 4. No recent solar/volcanic activity of relevance.
Curlyrocks - July 22, 2014, 1:35 am
probably the result of man made CO2 but we still have no definite proof..... but it rained last night, water doesn't just fall from the sky this must be some ones fault.
Curlyrocks - July 22, 2014, 1:33 am
do you have science to the contrary. I would very much like to know more about the last glacial period, or are you and the scientific community too busy thinking up new ways to describe how your more sure than ever before beyond a doubt that GW is ....
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 1:24 am
Well I and the rest of the scientific community stand corrected because a brief blog by the scientific journal of Scottsman.com said some Germans said an ice age occurred in 1 year. (My point exactly!)
Curlyrocks - July 22, 2014, 1:02 am
http://www.scotsman.com/news/world/last-ice-age-happened-in-less-than-year-say-scientists-1-1083252 Although the main theroy was that it rolled in, in about a decade, still about 1000X short of your time scale.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 12:51 am
"Some people" that you use to disregard the findings of the scientific community.
Curlyrocks - July 22, 2014, 12:45 am
And some people believe the last ice age rolled in, in under a year. Weather changes no one has ever been able to predict what's going to happen.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 12:23 am
BTW distant climate changes, with the exception of extinction events, generally occur over 10-100 thousand years. This current change has been occurring over the last 150 years.
Zeitguy - July 22, 2014, 12:09 am
Your poster is scientifically correct. Unfortunately your attempt to correlate current conditions with those of the past are sorely deficient.

CLIMATE CHANGE - An unproven theory created by scientists who have manipulated data to have $$$ rolling into their projects.



CLIMATE CHANGE? - What climate change? It's all an evil plot!

IGNORING A PROBLEM - Doesn't make it go away.

CLIMATE CHANGE - Good for the energy industry.

Believes that Man-made Climate Change is fake despite all the irrefutable evidence . But believes in a 2000 year old undead jewish man who can walk on water without a shred of evidence ................ Doesn't see the problem with that. -

TAGS: climate change tea party funny
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 5:47 pm
...were are all friends here. And if you are looking for some spirited debate with the occasional jaw dropping plot twist in this soap opera, then you've come to right place! lol In any case, mate, welcome aboard, Zeitguy. ;-) haha.. Cheers.
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 5:45 pm
But, like anything, it's all in good fun.Think of the guys at the beginning of 40 Year Old Virgin. They fight like enemies, cursing each other out, then hug as if nothing happens. It's one big bromance here at Politifake....
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 5:44 pm
But in any case, it's just old drama best left undisturbed. Someone compared me to one of the biggest liberals on the site, so I compared them to a well-known loser neocon who was banned from the site. So grown up of us, huh? lol...
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 5:40 pm
So it's not really an inside joke. More of a really LOW hit below the belt. Ironically, it would only bother you if you hated liberals, in Cranky's case. In the case of the former (i.e. the Neocon troll that was banned), the REAL insult is being him.
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 5:35 pm
Nah,the 'former' is one of the dumbest loser trolls to ever grace this board,banned for his trolling. Comparing someone to him is like calling someone stupid, but worse. The other guy,"Crankyhead",is an active liberal user. It's like calling someone a lib
Zeitguy - July 2, 2014, 4:40 pm
Hey what's up with the aarnatz,cranky thing? Is that an inside politifake joke?
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 4:39 pm
Better believe it. I'm Godzilla, biotch. I always leave a wake in my presence. If you can't take it, get out of the water. Ima comin' thru... Surfs up! X-D
EmmaRoydes - July 2, 2014, 4:30 pm
I guess I'm convinced now. I know that if you swim in the ocean, it causes tidal waves on the other side of the earth
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 4:22 pm
He get's it. Give the man a prize. BTW Thanx for the compliment. :-)
Zeitguy - July 2, 2014, 4:13 pm
BTW, I, for one appreciated the irony of the poster. A perfect example of our general voting pool
fauxnews - July 2, 2014, 3:22 pm
Surrrrre...Or is it just that when it comes to sarcasm,you are lousy at it?Do yourself and the world a favor,and leave wit to the professionals.Your comedy is almost as bad as your grasp of science,almost. ;-) Now THAT’s comedy! X-D Anyhow,time to move on
EmmaRoydes - July 2, 2014, 3:10 pm
I was attemting to show faux how ludicrous his accusations are, but no problem from my end the whole gesture was probably lost on him anyways
Mooooooooooooooooooo - July 2, 2014, 2:39 pm

I don't want to read the words "Aarnatz" or "cranky" from either of you two again.
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 10:09 pm
Need a hug? :-)
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 10:09 pm
TRANSLATION (Emmy): I know when I'm beat. So if you will excuse me now, I'm going to run like a coward.
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:57 pm
Sorry, but I have to do some grownup stuff, so you try to be a good little boy and behave yourself while I'm away
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:48 pm
Rage? See I told you to get an adult to check before you post nonsense. Just wipe off the drool, put on your safety helmet, and go for a walk
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 9:41 pm
(6+ posts later of hilarious Teabagger rage) *yawn* Huh? Oh, you again. Still Angry, bro? :-) Just remember: take a DEEP breath and look at the flowers, Emmy, look at the flowers. And everything will be OKAY :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dCn7d_jDjg
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:32 pm
Don't let it get to you. Just cover your ears and you can muffle the laughter
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:29 pm
Whats that cranky? I already told you to get an adult involved before you post things that broadcast your inability to get along with others and that your hallucinations can be suppressed.
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:25 pm
(Clapping for you)
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 9:24 pm
Very good. See how much better your understanding is when you consult an adult before you post? You should be proud of yourself now.
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 9:05 pm
Oh, I know you were being ‘sarcastic.’ You are just lousy at it, Second Lt Steven “ Emmy" Hauk. Do yourself and the world a favor, and leave wit to the professionals.Your comedy is almost as bad as your grasp of science, almost. ;-) Now THAT’s comedy.
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 9:03 pm
Sure....everybody is laughing behind 'my' back, Arnnatz. You hold onto that.
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 8:41 pm
are you still trying to figure out how the arctic ice field is growing in spite of "global warming"? Have you figured out that active sub-glacial volcanoes put out heat and that's what's melting the west antarctic sheet?
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 8:36 pm
routine and I'm sure that everyone here will continue to laugh at you behind your back or right to your face as you try to sound intelligent and fail miserably at it.
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 8:35 pm
The tinfoil hats are worn by climate nazis like you, not by me. I'm not an evangelical, so your bs about zombie jesus is totally bogus. But, that's ok, you've become as big a joke as cranky lately, so just go right ahead and continue with your comedy
fauxnews - July 1, 2014, 7:21 pm
Sure......this from a guy that said "relying on fake data from NASA anymore." lolololololol...Sorry...mate, but that tinfoiled hat only fits you. X-D Now, if you excuse me, I'm still awaiting your evidence for zombie Jesus. Waiting...
EmmaRoydes - July 1, 2014, 6:50 pm
Irrefutable evidence. bwahahahahahaha. Oh, did you actually believe it when you typed that. bwahahahahahaha


It's your 'move' climate-change deniers...* -

climate change -


CLIMATE CHANGE? - Nah, it can't be...

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - February 8, 2013, 7:14 am
Glass houses.
vbattaile - February 8, 2013, 7:13 am
Didn't I ask you not to use copyrighted cartoons???

THAT'S OKAY - They'll find an excuse to deny it anyway.

CLIMATE CHANGE - lets ignore the decades of scientific research in favor of a couple of vague theories by mostly unqualified individuals

ONGOING DROUGHT - It's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change it's not climate change naa naa naa naa...

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

crankyhead - April 9, 2013, 8:38 am
Don't know what a false correlation is, huh?
ipaprime - April 9, 2013, 8:18 am
again where are we in the long cycle. and where are we heading?
crankyhead - April 9, 2013, 8:13 am
So... because we don't know where we're at in the long cycles, that negates the effect that CO2 has on the atmosphere? Please. False correlation anyone?
ipaprime - April 9, 2013, 8:11 am
again where are we in the long cycles and where are we going? oh that's right we don't know
PapaFox - April 8, 2013, 9:12 am
It's the current short-term cycle that's the problem.
ipaprime - April 8, 2013, 8:28 am
So where are we in the long term cycles that govern our weather? or do you even know?

SCIENCE - IT WORKS - Whether or not you like the answers is your own problem.

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - March 29, 2013, 10:48 am
While climate change is a proven fact... unless you believe that science is merely a lie from the devil... whoever wrote that article really doesn't come across as very bright or educated.

Want to confuse a Teabag Party Republican? -

THE DUST BOWL - Your claims about man-made climate change are scientifically unfounded!

TAGS: golobal warming climate dust bowl
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

Renza - April 10, 2013, 8:41 am
so, this event that more or less temporarily destroyed an ecosystem, that was man made, is in no way comparable to human impact on ecosystems? Just want to make sure I understand.
Renza - April 10, 2013, 8:39 am
no, its clearly a legit argument towards the fallacy of human impact on the environment.
ipaprime - April 10, 2013, 8:31 am
tho to be accurate the dust bowl was not a climatological occurance. it happened because of over farming and removal of trees that provided a wind break. learned that in school
ipaprime - April 10, 2013, 8:28 am

RECORD TEMPERATURES - Climate change? What climate change?

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.6/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

StoneTools - July 31, 2013, 3:51 am
PeteofSanJose - February 2, 2013, 1:10 am
According to this chart, my heating bill should be less. Yet it's almost double! I wonder how that happened (I did lower my thermostat)

NO SURPRISE HERE - Stop being a sucker for corporate con artists.

TAGS: climate change denial
Rating: 2.54/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - March 22, 2013, 11:56 pm
Thank you for proving my point again. (d*** you're dim.)
foxrecon19d - March 22, 2013, 11:31 pm
And almost all climate change propaganda are linked to liberal big business "clean energy" coorporations (Solyndra, et al. What's your point?

DENIAL - Evidence is immaterial if the energy industry tells me to ignore it.

CONSPIRACY THEORIES - It's different when they're backed by corporate interests.

Climate Change -

TAGS: environmentalism climate change government science
Rating: 2.5/5

More politifakes by Cannabal

fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:26 pm
They have the "Walking dead" vote? See my avatar???? That's MY vote, b'itch! *pause to think* Zombies can vote?
foxrecon19d - May 12, 2014, 2:20 pm
Yes. It will be interesting to see the new strategy on how the Democrats will control the elections. They own the news. They have the dead people vote. They have the illegal alien vote. And they are denying the military vote again this year.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:22 pm
...the problem, though, is the dems strategy ONLY works in a big controlled election. A thousand mini-elections, most of them gerrymandered, are too difficult to control. Be interesting to see if they can pull it off. Would be the upset of the century.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:21 pm
I, for once, agree with you Fox. Fancy that. Way to read the tea-leaves on this one. I actually think you are right. The dems will use this, and minimum wage, to bring up the rear, hoping to turn out a firewall of progressives to win....
foxrecon19d - May 12, 2014, 12:35 pm
And there you have it, kids! With the huge amount of Obama supporters commenting on this poster and ignoring all other issues, the Benghazi false flag talking point for the mid-term elections will be global warming. Watch and learn.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 11:43 am
*yawn* Or you could finally do your reputation a favor (and do this forum a solid) and just drop this grudge once and for all. All you've succeeded in doing is getting more "egg on your face"(to quote you). Need a hug, bro?
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 11:18 am
What I posted: "WTF? Guest1833 is using a lot of lines from the "discussion" with fauxnews(lol) - I'm not sure why, but I have my suspicions." and that set you off? Seriously, you do need some anger management classes.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:40 am
So....what pops into your head? *note pad open, pen ready*
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:38 am
That’s nice.And when did this all start?In childhood?Now close your eyes and we are going to count backwards from 10.When I get to one, say the first thing that comes to mind,there’s no wrong answer. Okay,let’s begin!…10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2...ONE!
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:30 am
Nah,given your paranoid behavior toward me and the false accusations, you probably shouldn't mention my name at all unless you WANT my attention. You flaunted your right to go after me even after a mod told you to stop.Tell me again why I should care?haha
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 4:26 am
@Emma.."problem with understand anything, don't you" What native "language" is THAT? X-D
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 4:00 am
and, now that I think about it, fauxnews(lmao), what did I correct? Now think carefully before you respond so that you don't look like an idiot again.
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 3:58 am
geez, fauxnews(lol), all I did was put your handle in a posting and, all of a sudden, you take it as "dropping your name" You really are a goofy little squirt, aren't you? I really can help you get over your ego problem if you want the help.
EmmaRoydes - May 12, 2014, 3:55 am
You really do have a problem with understand anything, don't you fauxnews(lol). I guess we can go back to asking you just what the heck your native language is so that I can help you to understand and not embarrass yourself so often.
OTC - May 12, 2014, 3:19 am
The sun doesn't go anywhere, another liberal misconception I suppose. btw, since you're on a crusade against climate change, try to keep the temp around a balmy 72 while you're at it
Cannabal - May 12, 2014, 2:36 am
Insult? I was just being playfully sarcastic. But, hey, do as you will, and thanks for giving my crappy poster so much attention.
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:09 am
Scotland Yard has a old saying:“in a pool of suspects,usually the 1st one to utter a accusation at another is probably the guilty party.” If this truly has NOTHING to do with you,why dignify this drama with a response at all?Makes u LOOK suspicious.My 2¢
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:04 am
…because even if someone was 'impersonating' me, I certainly wouldn't bring it up here.lol..Why? Because it looks like you have something to prove now, like you're trying to cover your tracks, perhaps because you logged into the wrong account or something
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 2:02 am
Done reading."Emma"(lol),seriously…if someone's bugging u,then just PM a mod IN PRIVATE and let'em sort it out.Why always u with the PUBLIC display?Unless you're being directly attacked,you're just makin this into drama where there doesn't need to be any
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:59 am
Guest 1833??…WTH?!?!…lololol…Ah, a very complicated web weaved here. Fascinating!*in my best Mr.Spock voice*……….Will give my appraisal of the sit, in a few moments…still sorting this out…gimme a sec…Uh, what's your beef with Chelsea Clinton?!? lol
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:55 am
Ah, saw you corrected yourself a few minutes later. Glad to hear it. That's a good girl. For a second there, thought you were making another false accusation. Glad we are past that now. :-)
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:49 am
/typo…oops, d'amn computer, my bad…I meant "Emma"(lol)
fauxnews - May 12, 2014, 1:48 am
Why are you dropping my name again, Phlegma? *lemme put on my bifocals, squint* Let me get over to the computer and see what gossipy mischief you are trying to drag me into now...Gimme a sec to get up to speed on the drama...back with you in a few
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 11:49 pm
Nah... if I were John Kerry, I would gave surrounded myself with six battalions of Marine body guards, visited Camp Leatherneck in Afghanistan for thirty minutes, then put myself in for a Medal of Honor for picking a nasty booger out of my nose
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 9:58 pm
Are you John Kerry? ;o)
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 9:50 pm
I am part of the establishment. And I know what the establishment is capable of doing to keep itself in power, to include corrupting an environmental issue, a women's choice issue, a medical health issue, an economic issue, etc, and make it political
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 8:45 pm
For some reason a person who has been banned a number of times keeps coming into my mind. Someone with an agenda perhaps. Name starts with a V, but I can't remember the rest.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 8:42 pm
WTF? Guest1833 is using a lot of lines from the "discussion" with fauxnews(lol) - I'm not sure why, but I have my suspicions.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 8:38 pm
it is pretty obvious I'm not a man. insult? and were getting along so well. Well, I thought it was going to get civil. My mistake. OK, have a wonderful day.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:04 pm
Karma is neither liberal or conservative, it can only portioned out by the cosmos. I mean, hasn't that ever occurred to you, man?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:03 pm
Yeah, that's another problem: some people actually think that adverse climatological trends are "God's plan," forgetting also that we humans are supposed to be "stewards" of the Earth, and shirking that reponsibility will surely get us evicted all right.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 7:01 pm
What's that were saying about me being the angry one?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 6:51 pm
If it would help her get elected Hillary would schedule an abortion for Chelsea on prime time TV.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 6:42 pm
Oh, I bet she will. I heard rumor tell that ***k Cheney will be her roommate.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 6:09 pm
but it's so much fun. Don't worry too much, I'm told she will be joining us, in the cell next to me.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:55 pm
You only give Hillary Clinton more power by obsessing over her.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:41 pm
you know, a good dévstvennitsa?
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:34 pm
couldn't we just import some frigid wenches from siberia to replenish our stock?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:33 pm
Or at least, liberal karma
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:33 pm
You know, cosmic karma
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:32 pm
Don't tell Hillary's daughter that. There is always this to give you hope. http://www.tv.com/shows/strangers-with-candy/the-virgin-jerri-108007/
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:32 pm
Did you ever consider that it might be pre-ordained? If we f*** up the planet as bad as you say, maybe we don't deserve to be here.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:26 pm
No more virgins? Good! The world is a better place for it.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:25 pm
I didn't actually count them, but my bartender here told me there were 72. How many are there in reality? I will count them at the next barbecue.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:25 pm
You're absolutely right, which is why the climate is changing and becoming less and less favorable to us humans.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:22 pm
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:20 pm
and we do more harm than good.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:19 pm
Why are you such a liar? You and I both know there's no such thing as 72 virgins.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:19 pm
but at least we get p'ussy http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/in-the-loop/post/gitmo-prisoners-rewarded-with-kittens/2012/08/16/3a7c9fb0-e706-11e1-8741-940e3f6dbf48_blog.html
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:18 pm
The only way to effectively do that is to keep the government out of it. Otherwise it becomes a mountain of red ***e, cronyism, and poorly executed.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:17 pm
actually, I did spill a beer on it, but it was the fault of one of the 72 virgins who were doing a belly dance too close to me.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:16 pm
Considering that we humans are products of Mother Nature, we have to help it along by putting back what we took out and cutting down immensely on the pollution, and no, it doesn't require, massive government intervention to do that. People gotta act.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:14 pm
I'm using a guard's smart phone. I almost dropped it in the h** tub and almost spilled a beer on it too, so he probably won't let me borrow it again.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:11 pm
Now I know you're a liar. Of all the cool stuff Gitmo detainees get, internet access isn't it, because the appropriations for that hasn't yet been approved.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 5:07 pm
That has nothing to do with Mother Nature healing itself. Again the climate change debate is all about who can secure the most money from their governments, not about helping the environment, which doesn't need our help.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 5:06 pm
It's ok, I am posting this from my cell on Gitmo
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:03 pm
See, that wasn't too hard, was it? And it's much safer to do that sort of thing on the internet anyway, where government servers will log it and secret government tribunal will accuse you of treason much later down the road.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 5:00 pm
Exactly, which is why it would be prudent to consider a solution for that sort of thing. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/04/140417101148.htm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:58 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:57 pm
Honestly, that could actually work. But it doesn't, because everyone wants to be the "Invisible Hand" that guids the market to their own selfish ends.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:57 pm
I'll do it. All politicians are liars. The entire establishment is full of s'hit.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:54 pm
Then you also have the methane bubbles that come up from the ocean floor (kind of like the earth farting) Guess what, another natural phenomenon. I don't think methane is good for humans other than as a heat source.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:54 pm
It doesn't take courage to say that Obama is a liar, in fact, the majority of the posters on this site outright declare that very statement in one form or another. How about saying the entire establishment is full of s'hit; that take any courage, man?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:52 pm
You certainly didn't, but the article linking to Roy Spencer, who denies the theory of manmade climate-change, does not believe that the human race as a whole could make a decisive impact on global weather patterns over the course of time.
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:51 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:48 pm
Restoring the biosphere is the only way to keep the planet from killing us. http://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/article/1334017/air-pollution-leading-cause-cancer-world-health-organisation-warns
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:39 pm
Plus, I never said man doesn't contribute, but I think it's a stretch to say that volcanoes, solar flares, and natural earth cycles don't play a larger role in what happens to the earth than man does.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:36 pm
not natural
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:36 pm
That's a totally different situation. Bridges and roads deteriorate and need repairs. Pollution like Los Angeles has eats buildings and need repairs. That has nothing to do with Mother Nature healing itself. Afterall, buildings, roads, and bridges are
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:30 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:25 pm
Well-meaning though that letter was, damaging the landscape and increasing the pollution is not going to help in the long-run. http://www.resilience.org/stories/2013-11-11/we-have-the-renewable-energy-we-need-to-power-the-world-so-what-s-stopping-us
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 4:23 pm
Yup... because that is the logic that Barack Obama used. Don't believe it? Then find the courage to call Obama a liar
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 4:19 pm
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:12 pm
I won't deny that for a second, but since you bring up money, you think it will not be costly for us humans to rebuild infrastructure destroyed by extraordinarily adverse climate conditions?
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:10 pm
Exactly, money drives the efforts on both sides. If there wasn't any money in it, do you really think there would even be a debate?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 4:06 pm
And there is a concerted effort to downplay the notion that human activity has ANY impact at all on the surrounding environment and its mechanics, which is perfect for the fossil fuel industry, so it can maintain profits without having to change at all.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 4:00 pm
Climate change is all about who can secure the most money from their governments. In order to secure that money, they have to propose research that will prove what the government says, not break new ground.
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 3:58 pm
You can find the same thing in the latest IPCC report where the executive summary is totally politicized
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:56 pm
Oh, so the great globalist New World Order conspiracy shall be established in the name of environmentalism? I highly doubt that s'hit. The pretext will be infinitely more sinister than that.
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:52 pm
What's that you were saying about Nazis? http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-deniers-intimidate-journal-into-retracting-paper-that-finds-they-believe-conspiracy-theories/
EmmaRoydes - May 11, 2014, 3:41 pm
well, if we are posting links: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/61578
foxrecon19d - May 11, 2014, 3:32 pm
Climate change is the classic example of, what Obama famously called, a false flag. Ignore it. As early as 1970, the Democrats admitted that this false flag must be used to secure power. Meanwhile, Obamacare...oh... forgot about that, didn't you?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
By the way, I can post links, too. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
Well, I dunno, why don't tell me?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 3:24 pm
Well, I dunno, why don't tell me?
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 3:03 pm
guest1833 - May 11, 2014, 3:00 pm
Anger is bordering insanity, maybe that's why I find you amusing?
Cannabal - May 11, 2014, 2:51 pm
OTC, that sounds like a great idea, that way, you conservatives will understand where the sun goes when it's nighty-night time.
OTC - May 11, 2014, 1:25 pm
Liberals don't understand sarcasm. it ties to the nonsensical poster. next you'll make a poster about night and day?
fauxnews - May 10, 2014, 9:53 pm
LOL...Oh, you hit the jackpot. X-D
Cannabal - May 10, 2014, 9:47 pm
Well, that was a great nonsensical comment.
EmmaRoydes - May 10, 2014, 8:28 pm
You are right, here in the southwest at least, the climate changes a couple of times a year. Oddly, we get cold weather late in the year and warmer weather the rest. Must have something to do with burning wood in the winter to keep warm.


DENIAL - Always an uphill battle when facts get in the way.

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

NoJoke - February 23, 2013, 1:53 pm
The left should take their own advice.

CONSPIRACY - A conspiracy to actually help the country? How dastardly!

BLIZZARDS - Lies from the pit of hell.

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.33/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

Renza - February 12, 2013, 9:08 am
Just to note, its not just American scientists that are agreeing that global climate change is real... its pretty well a worldwide consensus between the scientists who study it.
Renza - February 12, 2013, 9:07 am
...How can a cause occur after an effect? Generally something happens to cause an effect.
WTFO - February 12, 2013, 1:51 am
PF, the politicians aren't in it for campaign contributions. They are in it to grow their power over people. The "scientists" get tons of $ from politicians for "studies". The scientists get funding, politicians get power, & people get screwed over a lie.
BALLS - February 11, 2013, 11:23 pm
Throughout the history of this planet, changes in temperature have ALWAYS come before changes of levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. The cause can never happen before the effect, therefore man made global warming is a lie.
BALLS - February 11, 2013, 11:18 pm
No, but companies that like GE that stand to make a lot of money off of CFLs do. So does Al Gore who owns a carbon offset company. There are plenty of people who will make a lot of money off of the farce of man made global warming.
Rudedog - February 10, 2013, 9:35 pm
Really, are we still debating over the Fact that the earth is warming. Scientist are in agreement but politicians are not. That whole evolution thing is a big lie also
PapaFox - February 10, 2013, 11:41 am
False. Scientists don't have the money to buy politicians like big oil does.
BALLS - February 10, 2013, 11:30 am
...from studies funded by the green energy industry.
PapaFox - February 10, 2013, 11:07 am
And the changes in climate due to fossil fuel use over the past 100 years.
JGalt - February 10, 2013, 10:28 am
climate change; aka weather, solar cycles, el nino, la nina, etc read up on these topics you might learn something from the pattern of the tropical storms and blizzards of the 50's, then the 80's and now...

One-in-Five Americans Believe Man-Made Climate Change is a hoax -

TAGS: climate change muslim hoax obama
Rating: 2.25/5

More politifakes by fauxnews

fauxnews - July 8, 2014, 8:57 pm
You arguing with the voices in your head again? lol... Or just "Fauxnews" withdrawal? ;-p This poster was SO yesterday. No matter. Will make some more. My gift to y'all. Merry Xmas! :-D
EmmaRoydes - July 8, 2014, 7:55 pm
Kind of like writing (_|_)theists instead of atheists
EmmaRoydes - July 8, 2014, 7:53 pm
Xtian faith? WTH is that? Some zulu belief? Pigmy? I've never heard of it. Or are you just too lazy or afraid to type the whole word out?
Bandit5906 - July 5, 2014, 7:13 pm
What faux scandals. They all see quite real.
fauxnews - July 5, 2014, 5:51 pm
Curly....why would anyone in their right mind 'want' to believe that President Obama is a "muslim"? Certainly the facts don't bear it out. Republican congressmen in his own govt acknowledge his Xtian faith. At this point, it's your bias.
Curlyrocks - July 5, 2014, 5:44 pm
Does this apply to Canadians too? I had no idea I was such a racist. Here I am taking on my own people (Ontario Libertarians) when it turns out I'm a racist and should just join them.
EmmaRoydes - July 5, 2014, 5:23 pm
or this: http://www.angusreidglobal.com/polls/48745/less-than-half-in-u-s-and-britain-believe-in-man-made-climate-change/
JGalt - July 5, 2014, 5:23 pm
how about focusing upon the poor leadership vs all the faux indignation and faux scandals?
EmmaRoydes - July 5, 2014, 5:22 pm
You need to do some homework. The polls in the UK say the same thing about the UK. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_opinion_by_country

GLOBAL WARMING - Damn those Liberals at NASA!

EVIDENCE? WHAT EVIDENCE? - Conservatives don't worry about it when Exxon tells them to ignore the facts.

TAGS: climate change
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

RonE - March 6, 2013, 6:00 pm
Evidence show it does not matter what humans do. This rock will not last past 5 billion years. It will not last 1 billion years as a habitable planet. Even sooner if some cosmic event takes place.
crankyhead - March 6, 2013, 4:59 pm
Keep ignoring the evidence though. Wouldn't want to contradict the premise of the poster now, would you?
crankyhead - March 6, 2013, 4:58 pm
crankyhead - March 6, 2013, 4:58 pm
crankyhead - March 6, 2013, 4:57 pm
crankyhead - March 6, 2013, 4:57 pm
The temperature data graphs are all eerily similar.
BALLS - March 6, 2013, 4:51 pm
Oh my god, a graph of CO2 levels since the 70s with absolutely no temperature data.

OOPS - Don't you just hate it when reality jumps up and bites you in the ass?

TAGS: romney climate change is real
Rating: 2.23/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

simplegenius - November 20, 2012, 1:52 pm
and many private companies that provide services are run better and more efficiently than government services. The government is bankrupting FedEx, Raytheon, private education, the Red Cross are not. the red cross off of donations clears their expenses.
simplegenius - November 20, 2012, 1:46 pm
you can also privatize it.. many government programs have civilian contractors who do better jobs than the original government department they help.
simplegenius - November 20, 2012, 1:45 pm
yeah let's just always set up government housing to bail out people who don't have homeowner's insurance or more specifically flood insurance. Personal responsibility not government handouts.. food/water yeah, but you can move for homes.

REALITY - Responsible people are dealing with it.

A GLACIER IN ARGENTINA 1928/2004 - I really don't know how this became a Political issue. When did politicians become Scientists?

SCIENCE DENIAL - Don't worry, they'll find an excuse to ignore it.

Climate Literacy -

CLIMATE CHANGE? - What climate change?


NO BIGGIE - If you cover your eyes and ears and yell real loud, it doesn't look bad at all.